Dungeon Crawl Classics RPG & Castle Zagyg at Anonycon

This weekend at Anonycon I will be playtesting the forthcoming Dungeon Crawl Classics Role Playing Game as part of an interesting experiment in which Eric G. and I will put the Forge axiom “system does matter” to the test. (That’s Eric the White Sandbox player of Bartholomew Honeydew, not any of the other Erics that New York Red Box has been fortunate enough to accumulate in numbers large enough to be confusing; let’s not be thrown off the scent by Mr. Honeydew’s many in-character aliases.)

The plan is that Eric and I will both do runs of Gary Gygax and Jeff Talanian’s Castle Zagyg: The Upper Works, leading into Joe Bloch’s Castle of the Mad Archmage.  We’ll do the same things that were so much fun when Joethelawyer and I ran it at Fal-Con:

  • a convention-long competition to see who can reach the deepest level and escape with the most treasure
  • a persistent world in which each session’s adventure changes things for the next party, and players can return to play the same character in a later run
  • player-created magic items whose effects are unpredictable and descriptive instead of mechanical
  • the likelihood of horrible PC deaths as parties bite off more of the castle and dungeon’s enormous environs than they can chew
  • and, if we have enough players, dividing players into two separate parties which are exploring the ruins at the same time and may clash with one another, as so memorably happened at the end of the first Fal-Con run.

The thing we’ll be doing differently this time is that Eric will be running Zagyg using his own AD&D house rules, while my runs will be using the playtest rules for the Dungeon Crawl Classics RPG. The differences between one edition of D&D and another are endlessly rehashed, and the DCC RPG has a number of unique twists that I’m quite excited about. But what effect do these rules variations really have on play? I think it’ll be fascinating to get some data on this question by trying two different systems in the same mega-dungeon environment over the course of a single convention weekend.

Courtesy of Wizards of Ur, this is one of the cartoons that will illustrate the DCC RPG rules, inspired by those in the AD&D DMG

The big uncontrolled variable, of course, is that Eric and I are different DMs each with our own styles, and we’ll have different groups of players each of whom has their own approach. I’m pretty sure that these differences in what each person brings to the the table always has a bigger effect on the experience of playing a roleplaying game than differences in the system they’re using; in fact I think a lot of what seem like important differences between this RPG and that one are actually second-order effects, caused mainly by the fact that different groups of players are attracted by aspects of each RPG (which might include rules and mechanics but are equally likely to include the game’s artwork, its image among gamers, the ways it’s marketed, the environment in which it’s usually played, etc.)

However, I think that the tournament format may funnel everyone into a common set of goals and approaches; certainly Eric and I have spent some time talking about standardizing our procedures & playing in one another’s games, and at Fal-Con the goal of getting deeper and finding treasure did prove effective in focusing the kind of play that arose out of the enormous Zagyg/Archmage sandbox.

Since much of this post is promising stuff that’ll happen this weekend – and appearing too late for most of y’all to decide “hey I want to go to Stamford this weekend and play games” (although you totally should, since Anonycon = awesome), I’ll end with some places you can read more about the DCC RPG:

Joe Goodman running the DCC RPG at the So Cal Mini Con III, courtesy of Cyclopeatron

Jeff’s Gameblog with images and notes

Cyclopeatron with a playtest report & interview at a Dead Gamers’ Society meetup

Beyond the Black Gate with a playtest report of a session run by Rob Conley

Bat in the Attic with a three-part report of that session from Rob’s perspective

One thing that’s worth noting about all of the above is that they’re discussing adventures written specifically for the DCC RPG, which in my experience so far have tended to be more or less linearly structured tournament-style adventures that have been fun because of their atmosphere and hideous death toll, in the mold of Tomb of Horrors/Tower of Gygax. I will be very interested to see how the system handles a mega-dungeon sandbox experience that’s more in line with the way my regular group plays; I expect that it’s going to be awesome, and think some of the unique things about the DCC RPG rules will stand out better against a more plain basic-D&D background. Cue discussion of where the adventures published for a system fall into the “system does matter” equation!

10 Responses to “Dungeon Crawl Classics RPG & Castle Zagyg at Anonycon”

  1. 1 Scott LeMien
    December 4, 2010 at 1:18 am

    Can I get some details that distinguish the DCC RPG?

  2. 2 Gregor
    December 6, 2010 at 11:01 am

    I hate to nitpick, but…The problem with the Forge definition of “system” is that it’s not the same as most gamers’ definition of system.

    “System” in Forge-speak is the means of how players at the table agree on what’s going on in the imaginary space of the game, including *but not limited to* the rules. Even with the same ruleset (say, if you were both playing with the same Red Box rules), you probably have different techniques, approaches etc. which would render your games different anyway. In short, you could say that each individual group has (or develops) a “system” of play, which varies from game to game, ruleset to ruleset.

    Sure, rules have emergent effects and definitely impact the game (second-order, as you say), but that’s not exactly the whole picture of “system matters” in Forge jargon (which really doesn’t help).

  3. 3 Scott LeMien
    December 7, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    Okay, I’m getting exhausted hunting down info on the DCC rpg, already. Spill!

  4. December 8, 2010 at 12:15 am

    I got a whole post on the topic, waiting for me to finish it.

  5. December 8, 2010 at 2:14 am

    I deeply regret I didn’t get a chance to try this puppy out.

  6. 6 Scott LeMien
    December 9, 2010 at 2:05 am

    Gah, finish it already! I’m re-reading http://batintheattic.blogspot.com/2010/11/erie-days-of-dungeon-crawling-part-i.html when I should be working on a paper on Juvenile Delinquency!

  7. 7 Scott LeMien
    December 10, 2010 at 7:40 am


  8. December 21, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    I’m looking forward to playing this. I think there is room for another approach to a 3E-lite game with an old school philosophy, and DCC sounds like a lot of fun. (I need to scurry out to get some funny poly dice, but otherwise I’d play today!)

  9. June 2, 2013 at 1:36 am

    all the time i used to read smaller articles or reviews that as well clear their motive, and that
    is also happening with this paragraph which I am reading here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Past Adventures of the Mule

December 2010

RPG Bloggers Network

RPG Bloggers Network

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog & get email notification of updates.

Join 1,054 other followers

%d bloggers like this: