15
Apr
11

Quick and Dirty Idiosyncratic Wilderness Encounter Charts

The Marsh/Cook Expert set has a nice, neat set of random wilderness encounter tables in the back. Similar tables can be found in other editions. These are pretty nifty in that they cover a wide range of terrain types, providing different encounter sub-tables for each type of terrain, so you won’t see the same monsters in the desert that you ran into in the jungle.

Nonetheless, there’s still a certain lack of variety. Might there not be different monsters on the jungle-covered Isle of Dread than in the rainforest of Hepmonaland? Won’t the humanoid tribes in the hills near Greyhawk be less powerful, numerous and varied than those in the Broken Lands? Surely the partially tamed wilderness in Furyondy isn’t going to be infested with big-ticket monsters that can butcher your 2nd-level party. And what about the demons and undead that should be roaming the downs and barrens of the domain of Iuz? I don’t see them on any of the standard tables.

So yeah, having distinct wilderness encounter tables for each region is awesome. But it’s also a lot of work! Fortunately, there are several quick and dirty way to make an idiosyncratic wilderness encounter chart. See below!

1) Steal it from a module. Are your low-level PCs traversing a marshy shoreline in a civilized — albeit unpleasant — area? Use the encounter tables for Nulb in T1-4: The Temple of Elemental Evil, which are full of relatively weak monsters, including pirates! On the other hand, the dragon-infested encounter table in X10: Red Arrow, Black Shield is well-suited to really nasty badlands where only high-level characters dare to tread.

2) Alter the distribution on the top-level table. Wilderness encounter charts generally have a top-level table which, when rolled upon, sends you to one of many sub-tables. For instance, with a table like this:

1 Men
2 Flyer
3 Humanoid
4 Unusual
5 Animal
6 Humanoid
7 Dragon
8 Dragon

… you can just roll a d6 instead. Presto, no more Dragon subtable, and no more dragons!

3) Modify the top-level table to make certain results common. For instance, in the above table, instead of eliminating entries #7 and #8 outright, you could replace them with “7: Merchants” and “8: Brigands” for a dangerous trade route. Alternately, if they’re going through the haunted Bone March, you could bump it up to a d10, with entries of “7: Skeletons”, “8: Zombies”, “9: Ghouls” and “10: Wights” to make the undead far more prevalent.

4) Use the tables as-is, but replace inappropriate or undesired results (maybe you don’t want Frost Giants in this volcanic badlands, or Giant Lizards in that taiga) with something else — either with a specific pre-determined entry, a “Special Replacement Table”, or with a whimsical spur-of-the-moment choice.

Give one of these quick and dirty wilderness encounter mods a try. If you do, let us know how it works for you!


4 Responses to “Quick and Dirty Idiosyncratic Wilderness Encounter Charts”


  1. 1 Naked Sam
    April 15, 2011 at 5:01 pm

    I like the idea of separating things into creature type. It helps begin shaping the encounter immediately. The DM can be judicious about what particular animal/unusual/humanoid would likely be discovered about its/their business in that particular area.

  2. April 15, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    Yeah, I love the type / subtype distinction and it proved really useful when my son whipped up his Pokemon wilderness encounter table; it was totally intuitive to him that in the plains you might find a grass-type Pokemon, and then list six of such. For those whose brains aren’t so totally saturated with pocket monster lore that a blank table is instantly filled up by the overflow, these tips are a great shortcut. Well done!

  3. 3 Charlatan
    April 16, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    Good ideas. Zak had some interesting, related thoughts. Being better at charts and basic statistics than writing, I’m inclined to agree that the random encounter tables are a particularly effective way to communicate a entire regional ecosystem: This is what’s here, and in what proportion. Go forth, and make sense of it.

    I also like the type/subtype organization for the fast adjustments it allows- for example, in the saltbox tables, I tick off some entries with a flag that means “if they’ve bought charts for and are hunting X, this entry becomes an X.” You give a great framework for improvising that (bump the type roll up to d10, and 9 & 10 are X). Since my emerging DM style appears to be “over-prepare, and panic at the table”, tips like this are much appreciated. Thanks!

  4. May 7, 2011 at 12:18 am

    I got’s my own idea on this which will be out presently. I agree that the MM2/greyhawk 2nd edition solution (individual d8 + d12 tables) is too much work and there should be a way to start from the common fantasy cliches we all have for various locations, adding idiosyncratic juice as needed. The variable dice types are one way to run a “smart” table and that concept is near and dear to me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Past Adventures of the Mule

April 2011
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

RPG Bloggers Network

RPG Bloggers Network

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog & get email notification of updates.

Join 1,045 other followers


%d bloggers like this: